Clarification on D.

[Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 11:52:42 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 20:00:54 UTC, aberba wrote:
>> From a technical and experience point of view (those with 
>> experience in large D code-base), how is only D's GC & 
>> optional MMM a significant production-use blocker?
>
> This is mostly a psychological effect of C++ folks having 
> aversion to any GC.
>

You should watch last year's CppCon 2016 talk by Herb Sutter, 
“Leak-Freedom in C++... By Default.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfmTagWcqoE

He goes the extra mile to avoid saying the GC word, until he 
fully explains what his library solution for "collecting 
resources" is doing, with the sole purpose to avoid loosing the 
crowd's attention.