const(Class) is mangled as Class const* const

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 08:30:43 UTC, kinke wrote:
> What I don't get is why it's considered important to have a 
> matching C++ mangling for templates across D and C++ - what 
> for? I only care about mangling wrt.

If you still think this is a mangling problem, please reread my 
first response in this thread.