[OT] Algorithm question
Mike B Johnson via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon May 1 04:32:19 PDT 2017
On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 04:15:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I'm been thinking about the following problem, and thought I'd
> pick the brains of the bright people around these parts...
>
> [...]
Since most real world problems would require selecting elements
more than once it may be far more efficient to sort by
P(x)(filter) then simply select a random element.
e.g.,
a = A.filter(x->P(x)) // Creates a new set a where only the
elements of A that satisfy P(x) are added
...
e = a.random;
this is O(1) if you only have to filter once(you can create a
container that always "sorts" on P(x) so to speak.. like a sorted
dictionary).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list