Interesting PRs: bringing type system legitimacy to shared allocators

[Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d]

On 05/01/2017 10:51 PM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> On Monday, 1 May 2017 at 16:31:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
>
>> If we had a type similar to TaggedAlgebraic...
>>
>> Destroy?
>
> It's too strict: you have to specify concrete types beforehand.

No, that's why my suggestion was:

"If we had a type similar to TaggedAlgebraic, but was an open variant 
rather than a closed algebraic (Ie, a type like Phobos's Variant, but 
forwarded member access without first requiring explicit conversion to 
the exact underlying type),"