DIP 1003 Formal Review

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 13.05.2017 16:30, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 10:27:25 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 12.05.2017 18:17, Mike Parker wrote:
>>> The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1003 [1], "Remove body as a
>>> Keyword", is now underway. From now until 11:59 PM ET on May 26 (3:59 AM
>>> GMT on May 27), the community has the opportunity to provide last-minute
>>> feedback. If you missed the preliminary review [2], this is your chance
>>> to provide input.
>>>
>>> At the end of the feedback period, I will submit the DIP to Walter and
>>> Andrei for their final decision. Thanks in advance to those of you who
>>> participate.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/fbb797f61ac92300eda1d63202157cd2a30ba555/DIPs/DIP1003.md
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [2] http://forum.dlang.org/thread/qgxvrbxrvkxtimzvnetu@forum.dlang.org
>>
>> Option 1 is good: There is nothing wrong with the current syntax. [1]
>>
>> Option 2 is bad: It's the function body, not the function.
>>
>> Option 3 is ugly: There is no precedent for '...{}{}' belonging to the
>> same declaration or statement.
>
> Hmm, I guess it depends on how you format your code.

No, it does not. This was a point about the grammar.

How would you feel about:

if(condition){ then(); }
{ otherwise(); }