[4Walter&Andrei] D is 40 times slower. We need a new language feature!
9il via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat May 20 04:34:55 PDT 2017
On Saturday, 20 May 2017 at 11:30:54 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Saturday, 20 May 2017 at 03:24:41 UTC, 9il wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> When users write math code, they expect [2, 3, 4] that the
>> code like
>>
>> [...]
>
> What you are saying is that there is a specific shortcoming
> that you are observing in optimisers, yes? Perhaps we should
> investigate how to fix the optimisers first before insisting on
> language additions / changes.
>
> Have you talked to someone with experience writing optimisers
> about what stops the relevant optimisation being done after
> inlining?
I just found that new LLVM solves this issue (and was very
surprised).
The reason that ndslice <=v0.6.1 was so slow is LDC Issue 2121.
I have added workaround in [2], it is v0.6.2.
[1] https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2121
[2] https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm/pull/41
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list