Warning, ABI breakage from 2.074 to 2.075

[Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 15:02:00 UTC, Jason King wrote:
> That’s a fairly important requirement if it’s supposed to be a 
> systems programming language, less so for application focused 
> stuff.  I would hope it’s at least an eventual goal even if 
> it’s not quite the case today.

The reason we don't have ABI compatibility is the same reason 
neither Rust or Go does, it's a lot of work for a minority of 
users and it stops the language from progressing.

Maybe D will have it eventually due to pressure from large D 
using companies, but I highly doubt it.