Should out/ref parameters require the caller to specify out/ref like in C#?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 05/30/2017 12:11 PM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 15:59:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 05/30/2017 05:48 AM, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev] wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 06:13:39 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 02:12:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That definition currently there is more precise than the definition 
>>>>> on that page has been historically...
>>>>
>>>> Apparently, it is not. Do you have a reference to Walter's change 
>>>> regarding `in` becoming just `const`? ...
>>> Unfortunately, `in` was never implemented as `scope const`.
>>
>> Why would it need to be `const`? Thanks! -- Andrei
> 
> What do you mean?

I think `scope` would be enough. People should still be able to modify 
the value. -- Andrei