Project Elvis
jmh530
john.michael.hall at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 14:27:23 UTC 2017
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 07:32:05 UTC, aberba wrote:
>
> I have gone through all the threads and none of the comment
> argues why we REALLY need Elvis in D. Seem to me like some kind
> of "language peer influence" or something.
>
> It can be done as a library and using ternary works (more
> expressive). The problems we need to be solving ...I'm gonna
> cry :( ...we aren't talking about.
I'd say add canonical versions of the relevant functions to
Phobos first and then if really popular add to language later.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list