Time to move logger from experimental to std ?
Claude
no at no.no
Wed Nov 29 21:14:57 UTC 2017
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 14:32:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> Hello, most of the changes made during the current year to the
> std.experimental.logger package are related to the cosmetic
> style. Isn't this a sign showing that the experimentation is
> achieved ?
I tried deriving FileLogger class to implement my own log
fomatting. I overrided beginLogMsg, logMsgPart or finishLogMsg,
but I could not do anything with it because the handle "file_" is
private (so I cannot access it within the derived class).
So I ended up rewriting my own FileLogger deriving directly from
Logger and copying most of the Phobos version code, but that's
not convenient.
Did I miss anything?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list