DIP88 Named Parameters, Status?

[Jonathan Marler]

On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 22:37:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Saturday, September 30, 2017 16:57:09 solidstate1991 via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:22:37 UTC, Jonathan M 
>> Davis
>>
>> wrote:
>> > [...]
>>
>> What about DIP45, or making export an attribute? That would 
>> help the language to go mainstream.
>
> As I said, any DIPs on the wiki which have not already been 
> accepted are effectively dead, because the wiki is no longer 
> part of the official DIP process (not that there was much of a 
> process before, which was part of the problem). Whether any of 
> the DIPs on the wiki are a good idea or not is irrelevant. Any 
> DIP that's going to be accepted needs to go through the current 
> DIP process:
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs
>
> No DIPs are going to magically move from the wiki to github. 
> _Someone_ (be it the original DIP author or someone else) is 
> going to have to take the time and make the effort to do 
> everything that's required as part of the current DIP process, 
> or the DIP will never go anywhere.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Hoping that someone will chime in and answer the original 
question.  It's likely that only Walter or Andrei can answer it.

Is it a waste of time for me to put effort into renewing this 
DIP?  Is it dead on arrival or is there a chance it could be 
accepted?