that is bug?

[Patrick Schluter]

On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 10:03:33 UTC, kdevel wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 07:22:19 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
>>> You may find an in-depth discussion of the C++ case in
>>>
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7499400/ternary-conditional-and-assignment-operator-precedence
>>
>> My formulation was ambiguous, it is the same precedence as the 
>> link says. The link also says that's it's right to left 
>> evaluation. This means that for expression:
>>
>>     a ? b = c : d = e;
>>
>>
>> right to left evaluation will make the = e assignment higher 
>> priority than the b = c assignment or the ternary even if they 
>> have the same priority level.
>
> To summarize: C++ works as expected and C prevents the 
> assigment because the conditional operator does not yield an 
> l-value:

Exactly


Now, the only thing is to clearly define what it is in D, as 
apparently it is neither the C++ nor the C behaviour. The old 
precedence table on the D wiki seems to say it is like C, but the 
example of that thread seems to show it's not.