Feature to get or add value to an associative array.

[Giles Bathgate]

On Wednesday, 18 April 2018 at 21:04:53 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
> Thinking seems sound, although having a name starting with 
> "get" does have the advantage of being more related to the 
> existing get.

Ah yes, good point. I think now we've had the discussion about 
other use cases though that ultimately there might need to be an 
"atomic" AddOrUpdate style function too, which I was thinking 
could just be called 'update'. The necessity to keep them all 
starting with get seemed less important.