Dicebot on leaving D: It is anarchy driven development in all its glory.

Eugene Wissner belka at caraus.de
Fri Aug 24 12:38:04 UTC 2018


On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 12:25:58 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 11:59:37 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi 
> wrote:
>> Just found by chance, if someone is interested [1] [2].
>>
>> /Paolo
>
> After having seen all the discussions around Mihails post in 
> these days, I'm puzzled by one fact.
>
> There was no discussions around one paragraph:
>
> "You can't assume there is any control over how declared vision 
> documents get executed in practice. You can't trust any 
> promises from language authors because they don't keep any 
> track of those."
>
> I think that this is one of the central points of the post, so 
> why?
>
> /Paolo

I think I touched it indirectly. There is every time "the 
feature" that will make D most popular language in the world, be 
it safety (which will kill C) or betterC (which will kill C?), RC 
instead of GC or whatever. A lot of work is done, but after some 
time everyone loses interest and the written code becomes a mess. 
Look how are Phobos containers implemented, there is no 
consistent memory model.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list