A betterC base

[ixid]

On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 14:56:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> ooh better last sentence
>
>
> D's GC implementation follows in the footsteps of industry 
> giants without compromising experts' ability to realize maximum 
> potential from the machine.

That's been said over and over and the message has not gotten 
through. With a pay for what you use approach the GC is just as 
available as it is now, and yes, I completely agree it's very 
useful and that the reaction to it is ludicrous. This is an 
illogical argument that we've lost so needs a new approach.