A betterC base

[jmh530]

On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 18:06:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> [snip]
>
> More precise GC exacts heavy runtime penalties, too, which is 
> why attempts to add them to D have had mixed results.
>


See, there's your problem right there. Now if you replace the 
current GC with the slowest possible GC you can think of and then 
replace that with a precise GC. Then all the comparisons are 
gonna come out roses. /s