A betterC base
bachmeier
no at spam.net
Thu Feb 8 19:51:05 UTC 2018
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 19:34:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 2/8/2018 10:11 AM, JN wrote:
>> I agree, however these languages would probably have been
>> successful even without GC, using e.g. some form of automatic
>> reference counting.
>
> If reference counting would work with Java, and was better,
> wouldn't the Java developers have done it decades ago?
The developers working on .NET had the opportunity to learn from
Java, yet they went with GC.[0] Anyone that says one approach is
objectively better than the other is clearly not familiar with
all the arguments - or more likely, believes their problem is the
only real programming problem.
[0]
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/brada/2005/02/11/resource-management/
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list