proposal: heredoc comments to allow `+/` in comments, eg from urls or documented unittests

[Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)]

On 02/09/2018 04:09 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 08:54:09 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
>> * `/* */` should never be used
> Not a single reason for that
Except of course for the ones that have been pointed out. And for the 
reasons you yourself brought up in favor of version(none). Not a single 
reason aside from all of those.

>> * properly nested `/+ +/` indeed don't cause issues
> Disproved two times in this thread. Anyway nothing properly done causes 
> issues.

Being that the issues with /* */ are a superset of the issues with /+ 
+/, they clearly cause fewer issues than /* */.

>> * unrestricted code (eg foreign code or unfinished D code commented
>> out) also cause issues
> Superficial
Irrational