Which language futures make D overcompicated?

[Manu]

On 8 February 2018 at 23:54, Suliman via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> I like D, but sometimes it's look like for me too complicated. Go have a
> lot of fans even it not simple, but primitive. But some D futures make it
> very hard to learning.
>
> Small list by me:
> 1. mixins
> 2. inout
> 3. too many attributes like: @safe @system @nogc etc
>
> Which language futures by your opinion make D harder?
>

1. Storage class as a concept separate to the type; in my experience
responsible for almost all complexity and special casing in my generic code
2. Wrong defaults for attributes
3. string mixins always used in place of some sort of more sanitary macro
system
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20180209/b808f521/attachment-0001.html>