A betterC base

[jmh530]

On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 19:28:40 UTC, Seb wrote:
>
> Yes, that's the intended goal.
> However, to convince everyone involved and to be able to 
> experiment with this in the wild for a bit, we went with 
> std.experimental first.
>
> If drawbacks get discovered, it's a lot easier to retreat.

Cool.

Do you know if compilation speed improves if using selective 
imports? E.g.
import std.experimental.scripting : writeln;
vs.
import std.experimental.scripting;

I suppose that's a general question wrt public imports, but in 
this case there is probably more to parse than in other smaller 
projects.