Anybody still using the chm docs

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Sunday, 18 February 2018 at 21:37:01 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Yes might be an option, but I have little experience with Wine, 
> and adding more complexity to an already complex tool seems 
> problematic. We obviously do build releases on Windows 
> (VirtualBox) and also have Windows CIs, but Vladimir's doc 
> tester is linux-only atm.
>
> I mainly don't want to spent more resources to work on this, 
> hence it's
> offered for adoption. You might want to collaborate with 
> Vladimir to
> integrate this with dlang.org's appveyor.
> It can easily test every build and upload artifacts for git 
> tags.

As far as I've seen, so far all failures have been in chmgen or 
some of its inputs or dependencies. I think that once chmgen 
itself is tested by CI, there should no longer be any blocking 
problems caused by building the CHM file itself.

https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/2213 is green and ready 
to merge, by the way.