Typedef.toString?

[Denis F]

On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 15:26:02 UTC, Meta wrote:
> On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 13:56:35 UTC, Denis F wrote:
>> On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 20:26:17 UTC, Meta wrote:
>>
>>>> find all this inclusions.  Maybe it is need to implement 
>>>> simple toString method inside of Typedef struct? Or just 
>>>> disable it at all?
>>>
>>> Yes. I doubt this behaviour is intended, so it's likely an 
>>> oversight in Typedef's implementation.
>>
>> Should be disabled also:
>>
>> factory
>> opCmp
>> opEquals
>> toHash
>>
>> ?
>
> No, Typedef just needs a custom implementation of `toString`.

I lean towards the idea to disable toString at all. Because if we 
wrap string type into it, string can leave Typedef wrapper 
unhindered.