Tuple DIP

[Timon Gehr]

On 16.01.2018 22:46, jmh530 wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 at 21:21:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>
>> My thoughts were:
>> http://forum.dlang.org/post/p3e4al$1jfc$1@digitalmars.com
> 
> A starting point could be an unnamed tuple built-in tuple type, but also 
> not yet deprecating the built-in named tuple type in std.typecons.
> ...

(That's what the current version of the DIP proposes. It does not aim to 
deprecate std.typecons.Tuple, it merely redirects it.)

>>
>> But as it has been requested more than once and it is a feature of 
>> existing Phobos tuples, I can add a proposal to the DIP that can be 
>> accepted/rejected independently, and add a few words to the 
>> "limitations" section.
> 
> Sometimes when you give someone the option to agree or disagree to a 
> bunch of different choices it's harder to come to agreement than if you 
> keep things simple.

I'm perfectly fine with leaving it out for now.