Shouldn't invalid references like this fail at compile time?

[Mike Franklin]

On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 01:08:19 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:

> If you add `@safe`, the compiler rejects this line:
>
>     ls ~= &foo;
>
> But that line would only be problematic if the pointer would 
> leave the scope of the function. It doesn't, so this is 
> actually safe. But the compiler isn't smart enough to see this.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18281