Is package.d a good idea?

[Yuxuan Shui]

On Sunday, 1 July 2018 at 11:55:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Sunday, July 01, 2018 11:36:51 Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d 
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> The entire reason that package.d was added as a feature was so 
> that modules could be split into packages without breaking 
> code, and it's still valuable for that.
>
> [...]

I was suggesting we do what Rust did. i.e. 'import foo', imports 
foo.d, which can in turn do 'import foo.bar', which will import 
foo/bar.d.