newCTFE report July

[Ali Çehreli]

On 07/18/2018 11:28 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:

 > 2. there was the problem of the IndexExp being unaware of being inside
 > an AddrExp which would cause it to first evaluate four[0] to 1, and then
 > trying to take the address of literal one (which is zero as the marker
 > for an invalid address).

Without knowing much about the compiler, could that be solved by 
changing four[0] to a reference expression? Is there even such a concept 
in the compiler? How does the non-CTFE compilation deal with that case?

Ali