Struct Initialization syntax

[Andre Pany]

On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 16:26:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
> tl;dr: the currently proposed syntax options are:
>
>
> ---
> struct S
> {
>     int a = 2, b = 4, c = 6;
> }
> void foo()
> {
>     bar(S({c: 10})); // Option 1
>     bar(S(c: 10));   // Option 2
>     bar(S{c: 10});   // Option 3
> }
> ---
>
> So the struct-initialization DIP has been stalled for too long 
> and I think it's time we finally get this story done.
> I personally prefer option 2, but this might be in conflict to 
> named arguments which we hopefully see in the near future too. 
> Hence, I'm leaning forward to proposing Option 1 as the 
> recommended Option for the DIP (that's also what the PoC DMD PR 
> implements). What's your take on this?
>
> DIP: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/71
> Rendered view: 
> https://github.com/wilzbach/DIPs/blob/struct-initialization/DIPs/DIP1xxx-sw.md

I also prefer option 3. From a readability point of view it is 
the most pleasant one (my personal opinion). I also like it due 
to the already existing struct initialization syntax I am using a 
lot.

Kind regards
Andre