DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Community Review Round 1
rikki cattermole
rikki at cattermole.co.nz
Wed Jul 25 12:46:41 UTC 2018
On 26/07/2018 12:40 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> Just to be clear, I'm also against all the new proposed addition for,
> named parameter, new struct initialisation and so on....
You'll go giddy once you hear about what I have planned after named
parameters ;)
But seriously tho, just because a pattern of code can be done purely in
library, doesn't mean it can't be done entirely better with a nice
simple language feature which makes it considerably easier to learn and
understand.
We do have to be careful, that we only try to go after features which
are fairly well proven to our existing code and not for a theoretical
improvement.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list