Is there any good reason why C++ namespaces are "closed" in D?
Atila Neves
atila.neves at gmail.com
Tue Jul 31 08:43:11 UTC 2018
On Monday, 30 July 2018 at 19:51:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 7/30/2018 6:45 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
>> On Friday, 27 July 2018 at 22:50:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> On 7/27/2018 10:28 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
>>>> But all I'm trying to do here is tell the D compiler how to
>>>> mangle symbols.
>>>
>>> Namespaces have semantic implications, too, such as overload
>>> resolutions. A namespace introduces a new scope, not just a
>>> mangling.
>>
>> Should they, though?
>
> They do in C++. That was the whole point of adding namespaces:
>
> C: void ns_foo();
> C++: namespace ns { void foo(); }
I meant "should they in D, though?". I don't want to import C++
semantics into D. I want D to correctly mangle C++ namespaced
functions and change nothing at all about overload resolution in
D.
>> Structs aren't namespaces, I wouldn't expect them to behave
>> the same.
>
> From a language perspective, they are namespaces.
Technically, yes. But not C++ namespaces.
> C++ has a lot of bizarre name lookup behavior.
It does. I don't think anyone is suggesting we copy it.
>> I didn't know about this and it makes things better, but it's
>> not a real solution to my problem.
>
> See my other post doing this same thing with structs.
It's not the same - if I want to link to std::vector and
std::string, I'd expect them to be used in D as std.vector and
std.string, not std.vector and HackyDThing0.std.string.
>> I'm arguing that reopening should be allowed.
>
> As detailed in another post, this opens a whole host of other
> problems. Even in C++, what names are visible in a namespace at
> any particular point in the compilation is a nebulous concept.
> (It is actually carefully specified, but you have to be a
> language lawyer / compiler implementer to know what they are -
> to the user it is erratic, random, and nebulous.)
Right, but D doesn't have to do any of that - as far as D is
concerned it's just mangling. Well, as far as the typical D user
that writes `extern(C++)` anyway.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list