An (old/new?) pattern to utilize phobos better with @nogc

[Seb]

On Monday, 18 June 2018 at 06:54:46 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 June 2018 at 20:17:36 UTC, Dukc wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I agree. And each too, of course.
>
> Thought again and not so sure anymore: I just realized that if 
> we are to do that, it should apply the same changes to tee, 
> find, filter etc. Probably too complicated to be worth it.

Yep, I'm aware of this and that's the argument why it has 
previously been rejected.