opDispatch and alias this
aliak
something at something.com
Tue Jun 26 03:07:08 UTC 2018
On Monday, 25 June 2018 at 23:13:12 UTC, Seb wrote:
> Apparently three years ago it was we decided to ban alias this
> and opDispatch in the same class.
> What are your thoughts on this now?
> Is anyone depending on using alias this + opDispatch together
> like e.g. in https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6596?
Yes! I at least depend on it:
https://github.com/aliak00/optional/blob/master/source/optional/dispatcher.d And it's very deliberate as well, and not sure there's a workaround if this is banned. Or is there?
I went thought the DIP and I'm not sure I could exactly
understand where the problems were - The first two-thirds seems
to describe how alias this is used? Is that correct?
The sections Resolution Algorithm first describes how it "should"
be resolved right? I didn't understand if that is different than
the current resolution (is it?) and how though. Is the recursive
alias this a problem or is that just a "btw, you can do this"
kinda thing.
The Limitation section also says that opDispatch and alias this
shouldn't be allowed, but why?
I think maybe the DIP seems to mix "will" and "should"? so it
makes it hard to see what is the current behavior and what the
behavior should be?
There is also no link to any discussions either - I see there was
a forum discussion 4 years ago though, was that part of the DIP
review process? - and going through it there were some questions
for e.g. walter, timon, among others that I don't _think_ are
answered in the dip.
Also, what would the work around be for code that relies on
opDispatch and alias this? And shouldn't the PR take in to
account the "Deprecation process" and deprecate it first before
banning it?
Cheers,
- Ali
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list