Do you have usecases for opAssign?
Eugene Wissner
belka at caraus.de
Fri Jun 29 07:31:42 UTC 2018
On Friday, 29 June 2018 at 07:15:38 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
> I'm doing a pull request to rewrite Nullable to use
> moveEmplace/move to replace its internal value. I'm considering
> whether it's better to let Nullable destroy its existing value,
> then memcpy the new one over it (via move()), or if it already
> has a value in it, if an opAssign to Nullable should assign to
> the underlying type.
>
> With that in mind: what *is* opAssign actually good for, now
> that we have move/moveEmplace?
>
> What usecase for opAssign would break if we replaced it with
> destructor + copy + postblit?
You can move only exactly the same type. with opAssign you can
assign a differnt type. So opAssign should forward assignment to
the underlying type if you assign nor Nullable!T nor T.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list