A Case for Oxidation: A potential missed opportunity for D

[Dejan Lekic]

On Friday, 29 June 2018 at 10:55:27 UTC, kinke wrote:
> Phobos. I understand the separate 'minimal runtime' need for 
> bare metal (no Type- and ModuleInfos etc.), but I can't help 
> myself in seeing betterC as, nicely put, worseD. I acknowledge

I *completely* agree. However, I have nothing against betterC as 
long as people like me, who do enterprise software, are 
guaranteed to see "-betterD" option (here I actually mean - as 
long as the "regular" D is improving)...