Vtable for virtual functions in D

[sarn]

On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 22:56:27 UTC, Henrik wrote:
>why do I have to put the @nogc on the constructor and
> destructor separately?

You can make things slightly better by putting @nogc in the 
struct itself:

struct S
{
   @nogc:

   void member1()
   {
   }

   void member2()
   {
   }
}

But, yeah, this is a current pain point: attributes aren't 
"deep".  Maybe one day we'll have a syntax for applying 
attributes recursively, but I think it's blocking on the lack of 
a syntax for inverting an attribute.  (I.e., a way to declare an 
impure/gc/whatever thing inside a region that's declared 
pure/nogc/whatever.)