Inline Module / Namespace

[Timothee Cour]

I'm sure he meant:

```
--- foo.d
module foo;
module foo.bar{
  void fun(){}
}

--- foo2.d
import foo.bar;
```


On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 9 March 2018 at 10:44, Jonathan via Digitalmars-d
> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> D kinda lacks a way of creating a module/namespace inside another file.
>>
>> D does have modules but they have to be in separate files.  (Though separate
>> files may be better coding practice, why is it D's job to tell me how to
>> code.)
>>
>> I think a simple way to do this with existing syntax is to add functionality
>> for `module` to be used as a block.
>>
>>
>>     module modulename {
>>         void fun(){}
>>     }
>>     modulename.fun();
>>
>>
>> An inline module.
>
> If you tried to `import modulename;` from some other module... how
> would the compiler know where to find it?