Am I reading this wrong, or is std.getopt *really* this stupid?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 3/24/18 12:59 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 12:11:18PM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
>> Anyhow. Right now the order of processing is the same as the lexical
>> order in which flags are passed to getopt. There may be use cases for
>> which that's the more desirable way to go about things, so if you
>> author a PR to change the order you'd need to build an argument on why
>> command-line order is better. FWIW the traditional POSIX doctrine
>> makes behavior of flags independent of their order, which would imply
>> the current choice is more natural.
> 
> So what about making this configurable?

That'd be great. I'm thinking something like an option 
std.getopt.config.commandLineOrder. Must be first option specified right 
after arguments. Sounds good?