CTFE ^^ (pow)

[Guillaume Piolat]

On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 02:23:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I think that that we all agree that having these functions work 
> with CTFE would be great. The disagreement is mostly on how 
> much of an inconvenience it is or how big a deal that 
> inconvenience is.
>
> Ultimately, it's just a question of someone taking the time to 
> do the work, not whether the work is desirable. And 
> fortunately, it looks like at least some of those functions 
> have had recent work done towards making them work in CTFE 
> (e.g. the PR that Walter linked to in another post).
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

That's great news!