Why is 64-bit dmd not built as part of the Windows release?
Russel Winder
russel at winder.org.uk
Wed May 16 09:08:01 UTC 2018
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 22:07 +0000, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 17:40:46 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:01:28 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> > > [...]
> >
> > Wait, dmd doesn't use cmake to generate the makefile!? IMO this
> > is the reason why configuration tools like cmake exist.
>
> CMake? Hah, no. They're hand crafted Makefiles written with
> quills.
Crickey, I thought they had been carved into the fabric of the Universe using
stone tools.
;-)
--
Russel.
==========================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20180516/0c77da1b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list