Sealed classes - would you want them in D? (v2)

[KingJoffrey]

On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 12:51:42 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
>
> Awesome, I love being on lists!

Well, just remember to vote *down* the dip then, cause if doesn't 
get through, your quote be on my list of 'why OOP programmers 
should not consider D' ;-)

>
> It happened to me too!
>
> https://forum.dlang.org/post/fbs28v$2ss6$1@digitalmars.com
>
> And then I learned how it worked and said "oh, ok, makes sense".
>

How can implicately breaking encapsulation make sense to an OOP 
programmer?

How can 'I don't care about your defined interface, I'm gunna 
bypass it' - make sense to an OOP programmer?

Let's be realistic here. The 'one class per module or it all 
breaks down' model, just won't suit 'many' programmers.


>
> Hm.. I see you are still here arguing though. Interesting.
>

Well, some good ideas (much better than mine) somehow popped up.

So there's hope for D yet.