Sealed classes - would you want them in D? (v2)

[Neia Neutuladh]

On Saturday, 19 May 2018 at 04:01:18 UTC, KingJoffrey wrote:
> Mmm.. that brings me back to the idea of sealed at the class 
> level again.
>
> class A
> {
>    private int x;
>    private(this) int y;  // imagine if you have lots of private 
> variables.
>                          // this could become pretty anoying - 
> and kinda redundant.
> }

All attributes in D work the same way. You can write things like:

class A
{
   @Jsonize:
   private:
   int a;
   string b;

   protected
   {
     long c;
   }

   @safe:
   void privateSafeFunction() {}
   void otherPrivateSafeFunction() {}
}

Perhaps you should learn more about the language before proposing 
specific changes?