Why do private member variables behaved like protected in the same module when creating deriving class?
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 00:54:43 UTC 2018
On Thursday, 1 November 2018 at 23:23:55 UTC, unprotected-entity
wrote:
> It's about clean architecture.
If you use interfaces correctly, there will be no private members
accessible regardless of privacy and D's module system.
interface I {}
class B : I {}
void workWithIt(I i) {
// nothing in B is accessible without ugly casts!
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list