It is the year 2020: why should I use / learn D?

[rikki cattermole]

On 26/11/2018 1:58 AM, Chris wrote:
> Guess why - and this speaks volumes - Johnathan M. Davis couldn't be 
> bothered to put dxml through a review process? Johnathan told us that he 
> wasn't "too enthusiastic" about it. Why wasn't the new std.xml ever 
> reviewed + accepted back in the day?

If you're referring to std.experimental.xml, simple it was horrible code 
that wasn't complete and I did try to improve upon it. It just wasn't 
good D code. It wouldn't pass the review even if feature complete.