DIP 1014

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 08:10:31 UTC, Shachar Shemesh 
wrote:
> On 04/10/18 11:05, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
>> On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 03:06:35 UTC, Shachar Shemesh 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> [...]
>> 
>> For the love of Pete, that program was an example of how a 
>> move hook should work, *not* a demonstration of achieving the 
>> DIP behavior without changing the language. I know the example 
>> is brittle and have said as much.
>
> The example isn't brittle. It is simply not an example.
>
> If you want to leave it out, however, then I think you should 
> submit an orderly proposal. The changes you seem to be 
> suggesting have consequences that go beyond what I think you 
> understand, and there can be no serious discussion of it while 
> it is not clear from your posts which part of what you say is 
> the relevant one.
>
> Shachar

While I want to thank you both, about the quality of this thread, 
what kind of "consequences that go beyond what I think you 
understand" are you thinking of? Can you give an example?

Thanks,
Paolo