Manu's `shared` vs the @trusted promise
Kagamin
spam at here.lot
Mon Oct 22 09:30:21 UTC 2018
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 22:03:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
> With Manu's `shared`, there is implicit conversion from
> non-`shared` to `shared`. It would essentially become a
> language rule. For that rule to be sound, any access to
> `shared` data must be @system. And more challengingly,
> @system/@trusted code must be written carefully with the new
> rule in mind.
Well, we have __gshared for that. When code is written carefully,
it works fine, C, C# and Java do well that way, you just
architecturally minimize amount of multithreaded code, and it
becomes manageable, for an example see
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/blob/master/src/core/sync/semaphore.d
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list