multiple alias this
Basile B.
b2.temp at gmx.com
Fri Oct 26 02:54:04 UTC 2018
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 00:26:43 UTC, Mr.Bingo wrote:
> An implementation method:
>
> Single `alias this` already works, this method leverages it to
> create a multiple `alias this`. This method is presented for a
> basic review
>
> 1.
> alias a,b,... this;
>
> Is this proposed syntax used for assigning multiple sinks for
> the dispatching of access '.' operator. It is also called an
> `alias this` with multiple implicit for the case of one alias.
>
> struct X
> {
> int a;
> string s;
> alias a,s this
> }
> X x;
> void foo(T)(T x);
>
> 2.
>
> Here the compiler chooses which alias works by inference.
> foo(x) fails because of ambiguity in that it accepts both
> aliases. The proposed rule is that that an `alias this` must
> resolve to one and only one alias. This rule allows the
> original single `alias this` algorithm to work for multiple
> `alias this` by effectively adding a loop in the testing
> section of the code(we test for each alias and if only one is
> successful then success, else failure)
That sounds extremely naive Mr Bingo. You think that because you
add a comma separated list you can just write a loop on top of
existing compiler code ? Semantic is much less tied to the syntax
than you think.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list