The State of the GUI
Adam Wilson
flyboynw at gmail.com
Sun Oct 28 05:56:21 UTC 2018
On 10/25/18 1:47 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 23:30:50 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
>> On 10/24/18 4:41 AM, Kagamin wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 06:20:05 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
>>>> Native toolkits are a dead-end. The future of non-Web UX is non-native.
>>>
>>> Last I checked Microsoft bets its money on cloud, asp.net core and
>>> typescript. See where the wind blows?
>>
>> Yes. All of those are server-side technologies. How does that relate
>> to a discussion about GUI technologies?
>
> They have corresponding client-side technologies, which are the GUI. Web
> is the better solution for all problems you speak about.
>
> On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 06:20:05 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
>> Another is that in my experience even native toolkits, such as DWT,
>> that can be used to build cross-platform interfaces tend to produce
>> mixed results. You run into a plethora of minor issues surrounding
>> differing Fonts/Paddings/Margins etc. So even though the toolkit
>> itself may be cross platform you still need to create three separate
>> interfaces to iron out these small but noticeable details. Electron
>> and non-native widgets solve these problems entirely.
>
> If only web did it right. In theory it can, but in practice it does it
> rarely. https://abload.de/img/tmpfzfuo.png is
> https://www.webbyawards.com/winners/ - a web design awards site, see the
> fonts and margins. And most cheap sites including google do it like this.
No arguments from me. So let's do it right.
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: EllipticBit
import quiet.dlang.dev;
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list