Why do private member variables behaved like protected in the same module when creating deriving class?

[unprotected-entity]

On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 15:44:15 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
>
> Java, C++, and C# all treat `private` differently, so if you're 
> saying we should do the exact same as they do, your request is 
> inconsistent and therefore unsatisfiable.
>
> I think this is the third time I've pointed it out.
>

what 'point' is that.

can you 'point' it out again for me, cause I'm not clear what the 
'point' of your 'point' is.

btw. It's interesting, how a discussion on this matter *always* 
ends up with posts using a tone similar to where you are now 
going.

i.e. it diverts more and more towards the personal, when people 
disagree with you.