Static foreach bug?
Timon Gehr
timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Tue Sep 4 19:50:27 UTC 2018
On 02.09.2018 15:45, bauss wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 September 2018 at 13:26:55 UTC, Petar Kirov [ZombineDev]
> wrote:
>> It's intended, but with the possibility to add special syntax for
>> local declarations in the future left open, as per:
>> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1010.md#local-declarations
>>
>
> Is there any plans to implement it soon
It has been implemented for a long time (which you will find is actually
clearly stated if you follow the link above). The only blocker is
finding a good syntax. Currently, it would be:
static foreach(i;0..2){
__local enum x = 2;
}
> or is this going to be another half done feature?
The feature is complete. There are just some further features that might
go well with it.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list