Source changes should include date of change

[Sjoerd Nijboer]

On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 04:59:08 UTC, Josphe Brigmo wrote:
> Yes, but the fact is they would not appreciate my work because 
> they do not appreciate it now.

I can't really argue against that logic.
But then again, I fail to see when such a situation would apply.
I personally use the tortoisesvn diff viewers bound to hotkeys to 
help me with this, giving me perfect date and revision tracking + 
commit messages.

Like you said, you might not have access to internet but git has 
the full history on your local repo and thus allowing you to do 
this.

My personal preference is with mercurial, but this this works 
with pretty much any source control system that has a local repo 
and a working directory.

> All it can do is add bloat. That is it!

No one here wants more bloat, and that's what they're scared of.
And that's why a usecase for this proposal is so much wanted.