Updating D beyond Unicode 2.0

[Shachar Shemesh]

On 22/09/18 14:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> As I said, it's exactly the same
> as arguing that words should be represented in Unicode. Unfortunately,
> however, at least some of them are in there. :|
> 
> - Jonathan M Davis

To be fair to them, that word is part of the "Arabic-representation 
forms" section. The "Presentation forms" sections are meant as backwards 
compatibility toward code points that existed before, and are not meant 
to be generated by Unicode aware applications.

Shachar